Close

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 52
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,613
    Rep Points
    3,270.5
    Mentioned
    125 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33



    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sw4y1313 Click here to enlarge
    So I just got done datalogging my first flash. I basically took all the timing/fuel/vanos jb4 pump flash values, your linear throttle map, the 335is WGDC values and put it a load target of ~10psi across the board and it took very well. Boost was spot on but was requesting and hitting about 10.9psi peak.

    Now I'm trying to setup load by gear, and increased my targets to mimic the jb4 map1 boost curve(14 taper to 11).

    Thanks again @V8Bait. After reading this I've been able to understand more tables and the true value that goes into them. Now I just gotta figure out why my requested load ramps up even though I have it set high from about 1700-4000 rpms without load by gear enabled.
    Boost limit offset % in the boost control group of tables. Lower the values below 4k rpm some and it raises the boost target, haven't found an ideal yet but 80-90 should get you started. This was Dzenno's recent find.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Darwin, MN
    Posts
    305
    Rep Points
    646.5
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    why the $#@! can I never post anything ...
    stupid $#@!ing 'rep' bull$#@! ...

  3. #28
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Darwin, MN
    Posts
    305
    Rep Points
    646.5
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    Thanks 'Bait.


    Click here to enlarge


    I can't recall what paper this came from, actually it was only a few and I extrapolated the rest.
    With a few more variables (piston speed and air density) you can built a very close, but still theoretical, ignition table.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,613
    Rep Points
    3,270.5
    Mentioned
    125 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by iminhell1 Click here to enlarge
    Thanks 'Bait.


    http://www.benzboost.com/images/impo...9d8e8936-1.png


    I can't recall what paper this came from, actually it was only a few and I extrapolated the rest.
    With a few more variables (piston speed and air density) you can built a very close, but still theoretical, ignition table.
    A few more variables? Like the ones I've been using to model the N54 here?

    Wasn't going to post anything since it's more just me screwing around from Saturday, but theoretical models are fun (still no vvt modeling in the calibration along other holes). I especially liked the MBT timing curve it spat out at the bottom.

    Click here to enlarge

  5. #30
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Darwin, MN
    Posts
    305
    Rep Points
    646.5
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    That looks to be far beyond anything I've personally modeled. I can handle mechanical aspects, static and dynamic. But any further than that I haven't ventured into, tried but takes much more time/knowledge than I have.
    The bad part form me is all my work is on a failed HDD that I have not found a program that can recover it yet.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by iminhell1 Click here to enlarge
    The bad part form me is all my work is on a failed HDD that I have not found a program that can recover it yet.
    There are data recovery specialists you can send it to if it's necessary.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Darwin, MN
    Posts
    305
    Rep Points
    646.5
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    3 out of 3 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    I've really been trying to avoid that due to some questionable content.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by iminhell1 Click here to enlarge
    I've really been trying to avoid that due to some questionable content.
    Heh, I'm sure we all understand.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    -132 m ASL
    Posts
    160
    Rep Points
    242.5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Going to study your file Click here to enlarge thanks a lot, sorry couldn't add rep

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Georgia, Tbilisi
    Posts
    63
    Rep Points
    61.3
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    thanks!

    no bin files?

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    75
    Rep Points
    155.2
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Yes Reputation No
    @V8Bait, whats your stance on throttle closures? I'm holding target all the way to redline, but I'm getting a ton of throttle closures. Or is that just the DME attempting to not overshoot target load?

    I lowered the values in Boost Limit Offset % from 160 load and 4000rpms and down to 90, but it still hasn't shown any more than 10.7psi Boost Target from 1800-3000rpms. At 3000rpms is when it then ramps up again. I'm then hitting about 14.6psi by 3600rpms. After messing with the WGDC Adder/Ceiling tables I was able to hold boost better above 4000rpms and taper to 11psi by 6500rpms. So I seem to have fixed boost in the upper rpm's, but not down low.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,613
    Rep Points
    3,270.5
    Mentioned
    125 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sw4y1313 Click here to enlarge
    @V8Bait, whats your stance on throttle closures? I'm holding target all the way to redline, but I'm getting a ton of throttle closures. Or is that just the DME attempting to not overshoot target load?

    I lowered the values in Boost Limit Offset % from 160 load and 4000rpms and down to 90, but it still hasn't shown any more than 10.7psi Boost Target from 1800-3000rpms. At 3000rpms is when it then ramps up again. I'm then hitting about 14.6psi by 3600rpms. After messing with the WGDC Adder/Ceiling tables I was able to hold boost better above 4000rpms and taper to 11psi by 6500rpms. So I seem to have fixed boost in the upper rpm's, but not down low.
    My stance on throttle closures is drink more on a Friday night and you don't notice them as much!

    But seriously in answer to your question (disclaimer I've been following my own throttle closure advice) you need to realize that boost limit offset doesn't use load axis (i know right, this was a total shock to me too) those values are actually what equates to cam timing. At low "load" you have lots of overlap at high throttle angles, and a low lobe separation angle. So you need to drop the offset values at lower axis points than if they are load i guess I'm saying.

    And why are you only running like 11psi???

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    75
    Rep Points
    155.2
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by V8Bait Click here to enlarge
    My stance on throttle closures is drink more on a Friday night and you don't notice them as much!

    But seriously in answer to your question (disclaimer I've been following my own throttle closure advice) you need to realize that boost limit offset doesn't use load axis (i know right, this was a total shock to me too) those values are actually what equates to cam timing. At low "load" you have lots of overlap at high throttle angles, and a low lobe separation angle. So you need to drop the offset values at lower axis points than if they are load i guess I'm saying.

    And why are you only running like 11psi???
    Hmmm, I wasn't expecting that.... Good to know! I'll mess with it a bit more. I don't have a laptop so making quick changes is a pain.

    I'm only running 11psi up top because I'm 100% stock on 92oct. My load target is supposed to hit 12psi and taper to 10, but it wants to target 14.5psi instead. I'm ok with that because thats my goal anyways, but after I understand everything. I'm also getting timing corrections on 3 cylinders at random spots. I'm changing out my plugs tomorrow for NGK's. This car has 80k on it and I have no idea how old they are.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2
    Rep Points
    20.0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    What ever happened to the xdf's and .bin's that Justin posted? Currently running shivs oft files lol

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    220
    Rep Points
    398.2
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Cyrus2327 Click here to enlarge
    What ever happened to the xdf's and .bin's that Justin posted? Currently running shivs oft files lol
    I still have them saved but they aren't of any use. If you really want them I can upload them.

    The XDFs have had all the bugs fixed and updated with new tables and are hosted on GitHub.

    The BIN files are don't contain any changes you can't find in OFT maps or the backend flashes.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by CarAbuser Click here to enlarge
    If you really want them I can upload them.
    Upload them here.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by CarAbuser Click here to enlarge
    The XDFs have had all the bugs fixed and updated with new tables and are hosted on GitHub.
    Upload them here as well. Make the database as full as possible of quality files.

    I spent a ton of money on it for you guys. Use it.
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    220
    Rep Points
    398.2
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Upload them here.



    Upload them here as well. Make the database as full as possible of quality files.

    I spent a ton of money on it for you guys. Use it.
    I've uploaded the ROMs but they haven't appeared. Does this just take time or was there an error in the upload?

  18. #43
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    108
    Rep Points
    264.0
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    Yes Reputation No
    nice spreadsheet @V8Bait! the only thing I would add is the potential of having to lower your fuel scalar to <1.0 if needed when running 93 as I had to, only kinda special thing needed is to edit the XDF limits on that table to be <1.0

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by CarAbuser Click here to enlarge
    I've uploaded the ROMs but they haven't appeared. Does this just take time or was there an error in the upload?
    They were approved... you should see them.
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,613
    Rep Points
    3,270.5
    Mentioned
    125 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sw4y1313 Click here to enlarge
    Hmmm, I wasn't expecting that.... Good to know! I'll mess with it a bit more. I don't have a laptop so making quick changes is a pain.

    I'm only running 11psi up top because I'm 100% stock on 92oct. My load target is supposed to hit 12psi and taper to 10, but it wants to target 14.5psi instead. I'm ok with that because thats my goal anyways, but after I understand everything. I'm also getting timing corrections on 3 cylinders at random spots. I'm changing out my plugs tomorrow for NGK's. This car has 80k on it and I have no idea how old they are.
    Load target and boost limit multiplier are the major ones for boost target, load is indexed by rpm and boost limit multiplier uses MAF. Try lowering them, the load vs boost calculation in the spreadsheet is not always accurate depending on other table values, but it gets you in the ballpark when you're new at all this.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by CarAbuser Click here to enlarge
    I've uploaded the ROMs but they haven't appeared. Does this just take time or was there an error in the upload?
    Those old maps are pretty simple, were made for bbflash and mostly used as backends so the boost control had pretty minimal effort. Someday i may put up new ones, just don't want to become 100 people's e-mechanic again.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    22
    Rep Points
    53.2
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Thank you for providing it to all the N54 enthusiast out there Click here to enlarge

    looking forward to see some new things on your Spreadsheet in the future.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Georgia, Tbilisi
    Posts
    63
    Rep Points
    61.3
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    can not download file, unavailable

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by levanime Click here to enlarge
    can not download file, unavailable
    Works fine for me?
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Sweden Malmö
    Posts
    1
    Rep Points
    2.1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    2
    Rep Points
    27.1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Thanks for this!!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •